Civil War

fighttime is a time when propaganda and nationalism thrive, and the Ameri arse Civil struggle was not an exception to this generalization. Many authors wrote their own offices of the war into stories all during or after the war, and many did not share the patriot deliberate of war as glorious. Different authors chose to book of facts this instal in different ways. Two authors that we studied in this class, Samuel Clemens and Stephen Crane, chose to lecture their own views of the war through pieces that incorporate elements of literary chaff. In this paper, I plan to show how Clemens and Crane employ elements of literary mockery in order to present a view of war as anything but glorious. To begin, it is important to define satire as it will be apply in this paper. check up on to Dictionary.com, a satire is a literary work in which human vice or folly is attacked through chaff, derision, or wit. This paper will focus primarily on braces elements of this defini tion: folly and irony. Folly, as used in this paper, is define as lack of understanding or sense (Dictionary.com). twit has two definitions as relevant to this paper.

The first definition of irony is an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, anticipate, and the mho is the indirect presentation of a contradiction in terms between an grammatical construction and the context in which it occurs (Dictionary.com). By combining these definitions, one prat arrive at the meaning of satire as it is used in this paper: a satire is a literary device used to attack human folly by means of either pre senting the reader with an outcome that is t! he opposite of what was expect or through the indirect presentation of a contradiction between an expression and the context in which it occurs.If you want to get in out a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay